BOARD OF SELECTMEN
APRIL 22, 2004
REGULAR SESSION MINUTES
“APPROVED”
The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m.
Present: Thomas D. Hartnett, Chair; George F.
Dillon, Jr., Vice Chair; John L. Saball; Clerk; Peter S. Cunningham, Member;
Administrative Officer Jean E. Kitchen and Maria Casey, Administrative
Secretary.
*Absent:
Virginia C. Wood, Member.
Mill Street Relocation/Discontinuance
Mr. Cunningham moved to open the hearing at
6:32 p.m. Seconded by Mr.
Dillon. Unanimous vote. Mr. Cunningham read the legal notice as duly posted April 7,
2004, in the Lowell Sun and April 16, 2004, in the Groton Herald -- two
successive weeks. Mr. Hartnett
verified the notification of certified abutters as required by law, mailed to
abutters “directly abutting the affected road in question.”
Mr. Hartnett recognized the Department Heads in
attendance for either support or objection.
Highway Surveyor Tom Delaney was in attendance and
supports the relocation/discontinuance as noted on the Plans (copy attached).
Police Chief Mulhern was in attendance and also
supports the relocation/discontinuance as noted on the Plan and further added
that this Plan would need the input of Mass Highway, as Route 119 is a state
road.
Planning Board Member Josh Degen noted that the
Planning Board hasn’t taken a formal vote, however, noted that the applicant,
Mr. Walker, had been before the Planning Board before with a plan and had
withdrawn the plan without prejudice.
He also noted that Planning Administrator Michelle Collette submitted a
memo with all the back up and substantiating memos regarding this project.
*Virginia Wood arrived at 6:50 p.m.
Groton Electric Light Department Manager Steve
Moulton was in attendance and also was in support of this project. He further noted that as of
January 27th request of Fay, Spofford & Thorndike (FST) to
remove an existing light pole and refeed Mill Street based on the
recommendation. The cost to do the
work is approximately $11,453.
Water Department Superintendent Tom Orcutt was in
attendance and noted that Mr. Walker has already met with them and has agreed
to create a utility easement for water.
Sewer Commission Harlan Fitch was in attendance and
noted that the applicant is required to have the requisite inspections and
coordination through Pepperell.
Mr. Hartnett then continued with Abutter Recognition. Mr. Bruce Clements, 274 Boston Road stated that this plan
seems to have a better alignment and questioned whether it is known what will
be done with the land that is being discontinued?
Mary Durham, 210 Mill Street is a “near neighbor”
concerned with the totality of this project. She stated that there are still many “not knowns” and this
is a concern. She stated her hope
that this project receives due diligence with traffic studies, etc. She further
stated that with the history of this area, she does not see a need or urgency
to hurry this project through.
Planning Board member Carolyn Perkins inquired
whether there is a summary of the final agreement on how this project is going to
be managed and it’s impact on Town’s resources.
Mr. Hartnett replied that the Board of Selectmen
(BOS) has Draft 4 of Memorandum of Understanding (Agreement) that Mr. Walker
will be adhering to some of includes:
$100,000 cash for the future to build the traffic light; Mr. Walker will
build the road; and $10,000 for NEBS to relocate the driveway to the “White
House” a/k/a Darling house to join Mill Street for which Mr. Hartnett and
Dillon met with the NEBS Facility Vice President.
Harlan Fitch referenced his letter submitted for the
hearing regarding turning lanes and retention basins.
Planning Administrator Michelle Collette noted that
the design engineer is present and would perhaps be able to summarize the
plan. She further noted that the
present configuration of Mill Street today is extremely dangerous and this plan
will make a significant improvement.
Engineer Mark Sleger of Land Tech Consultants noted
that there is indeed storm water management to infiltrate the water back into
the ground in the “island” section of the road. He stated that Mill Street is 22 feet wide. He had noted the relocation portion and
the discontinued portion. The
pavement width in and out of the complex is 43 feet wide with one lane in and
one lane out with no turn delineations.
He noted that Mass Highway is in favor of this design as proposed.
Carrie Kneeland, 13 Anthony Drive, submitted a
letter of objection with the following summarized points: a) with the seven to eight cue line of
cars being backed up on Mill Street, this will prevent residents of Anthony
Drive from getting onto Mill Street; b) she questioned the retaining wall which
should be at its height of 6 to 7 feet; c) the emergency entrance onto Anthony
Drive in directly in front of her house per the recommendation of the Police
and Fire Chief and the proposed entrances were supposed to be one on Mill
Street and one on Main Street.
It was noted that the Fire Chief, who was not in
attendance, submitted a memo regarding his support of this plan. Mr. Dillon concurred that the Fire Chief’s memo is unclear.
Mr. Sleger noted that the entrance changes were made
because they would not meet Planning Board Standards. There would be very little straight a way and then a sharp
S-curve.
Mr. Degen clarified that the Planning Board did not
hire FST however the ZBA did, and FST appeared before Planning Board to make
recommendations. FST stated that
either intersection plan would work.
The Engineers must make their recommendations based on whichever
proposal is before them at the time.
He also added that the applicant (Mr. Walker) would have to do all of
this noted $600,000 worth of work anyway which is required. Mr. Degen stated that when the 40B
project was before the Planning Board last year, they requested in excess of 10
waivers from subdivision regulations.
He inquired if Mr. Walker would agree this evening to a reduction from
48 to 44 units, as the ZBA is not equipped to handle this “daunting process.” And further that he’d like the
“Agreement” to be revised to make the Planning Board part of the process, not
as an advisory review.
Chief Mulhern stated that both of the engineering
traffic consultants are two good reputable companies and he has worked with
them both on other studies, as well as other projects. Chief Mulhern agrees with the
Engineer’s recommendations for this plan.
Mr. Dillon inquired how large the area in between
the Mill Street proposed relocation and the discontinued road is. Mr. Sleger replied that it is 22,000
square feet, approximately ½ acre.
Attorney Douglas Deschenes spoke next. He represents Groton Residential
Gardens and Ryan Development. The
40B project is on the north side and “Kelly’s Lounge” land is going to be
integrated onto the 40B project.
The commercial building is some 4,000 square feet. Kelly’s land parcel could be developed
in some other fashion if they so choose.
This plan has been reviewed by no less than four engineers including
Jennifer Connolly, FST, LandTech and Mass Highway has reviewed and approved
this. He further stated that this
realignment, relocation wouldn’t cost the Town anything. Regarding the traffic light study, the
study has been completed and although the warrant proves that this road does
not qualify for a traffic light, Mr. Walker has given the Town $100,000 to
build and install that light or to put the money to some future use that the
Town deems necessary.
Mr. Hartnett inquired if Mr. Walker would consider
reducing the number of units of units from 48 to 44 on the 40B proposal. Mr. Walker replied that it has been
discussed in earnest and is on the table and he would give it consideration at
the end of the hearing.
Mr. Stuart Schulman was in attendance and is the
Chair of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
He stated that part of the pro forma application is reviewing to see if
the applicant could afford 44 units and make a profit and if so, they will
recommend this; however they are making no commitment at this point.
Highway Surveyor Tom Delaney remarked that the
traffic light project costs approximately $1,000,000 not $100,000 as previously
stated and stated further that the Town will design the road but Mr. Walker is
going to be responsible for building the road.
It was asked if Mr. Walker could make the road
narrower versus wider. Mr.
Sleger replied yes. It was
additional discussed that the road could have the potential of 43 feet wide but
keeping the pavement to 22 feet would be more advantageous.
Mr. Dillon asked Mr. Walker if he had received and
reviewed “Draft 4” of the Agreement and would he be willing to sign it as it
is. Mr. Walker replied yes.
Steve Moulton, speaking as a citizen, stated that
even with a 43-foot road that would make it tough for truck drivers to make the
swing
Planning Board Member Anna Eliot stated that the Planning
Board does not have the findings and has no knowledge of what will be done with
the island parcel.
Mr. Dillon stated that for the record a lot of the
prior concerns have been addressed and incorporated into the “Agreement.”
Mr. Saball stated that with the changes as proposed,
it’s important that we listen to the residents and how it’s going to affect
them. He has heard from numerous
residents with numerous concerns such as truck traffic on Mill Street and with
the changes how it will affect the stopping and starting of these trucks and
the turning of these large vehicles, the dangerous S turns these trucks need to
make at the other end of Mill Street.
Mr. Saball agrees with that the T intersection is safer; however he
would like the BOS to look at potentially diverting the truck traffic off Mill
Street and felt that this would be the appropriate time to look at it.
Ms. Wood thanked the staff
for putting together all of the documentation for this project. Ms. Wood further stated that her only
concern is #6 on the Agreement, which states that “the final design of the
commercial building shall be submitted to the Groton Planning Board for its
advisory recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals prior to the issuance of
any comprehensive permit.” Ms.
Wood stated her concern with the word “advisory.” She inquired whether Mr. Walker would comply with the
recommendations of the Planning Board or if he would consider it advisory.
Mr. Schulman assured Ms.
Wood that the ZBA would be seeking and taking the advise of the Planning Board
and incorporating that as part of the 40B project.
Mr. Cunningham stated that Mr. Saball had some good
feedback regarding the trucks on Mill Street and echoes Michelle Collette’s
concern of this dangerous intersection as it presently is. Regarding Mr. Saball’s comments, Mr.
Cunningham felt that it is separate from the Mill Street Relocation/
Discontinuance; however he concurred that this issue needs to be reviewed. He further stated that this was a great
opportunity for the Town to correct the road at no cost to the Town.
Mr. Cunningham moved to close the hearing at
7:46 p.m. Seconded by Ms.
Wood. Unanimous vote.
Mr. Cunningham moved to approve the
relocation of Mill Street by accepting as a Public Way the Parcel of Land shown
as Parcel T ("Mill Street Relocation") on a Plan entitled
"Definitive Subdivision Plan of Land, Mill Street, Groton, MA Prepared
for: Ryan Development LLC", Scale: 1"=50' dated September 26, 2002,
revised 11/7/02, 12/18/02, 2/4/03, 2/11/03 and 3/18/04, prepared for Land Tech
Consultants, Inc. and further to
discontinue as a Public Way those portions of Mill Street shown as Parcels Q,
R, and S on said plan. Seconded by
Ms. Wood. Unanimous vote.
Mr. Cunningham moved to sign the Development Agreement,
Draft #4, dated April 22, 2004.
Seconded by Mr. Dillon.
Unanimous vote.
Ms. Wood moved to adjourn the meeting at
7:56p.m. Seconded by Mr.
Dillon. Unanimous vote.
______________________________
Approved:
_____________________________ Respectfully
submitted,
John L. Saball, Clerk Maria
Casey,
Administrative
Secretary
Date Approved:
May 3, 2004
Attachments (1)
Definitive Subdivision Plan of Land a/k/a Mill
Street Relocation/Discontinuance